|
|
| Blog Archives - 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 |
|
| Eduardo Ramirez | February 23, 2024 10:17:45 PM |
| I want to add that MPI still consider you for suspension for a couple years after the accident so you're not quite off the hook. |
|
| Eduardo Ramirez | February 23, 2024 9:54:09 PM |
License Suspensions due to accidents (or maybe a combination of things such as speeding tickets, etc.)
If you have received notice of a potential license suspension.
YOUR BEST BET is to buyback your accidents, this makes it so that your accident disappears from your record. This is expensive, but if not driving would turn your life upside-down it might be worth it.
If you get suspended for an accident and a speeding ticket or something, just buyback the accident and their logic for suspending you dramatically reduces. |
|
| Nestor u | December 2, 2023 3:59:21 AM |
| My car was rear-ended by Ontario car. According to MPI we have to pay the deductible since they did not insured the Ontario car. I mean if we are hit by these outside Manitoba cars that are around, we just need to feel sorry and suck up to pay the deductible fee. This doesn't feel right. |
|
| John | November 6, 2023 8:03:26 PM |
| Where would I get a lawyer to help me with a civil litigation with mpi as the claimant . Need serious serious help feel like I am being over power by there legal team |
|
| annu | September 14, 2023 4:20:54 PM |
| Hello Good Afternoon, how you guys think of the MPI worker's Strike, I think they made people suffer too much all the years, and now they deserve to be walking on the streets, They were working for their Bosses now bosses has thrown them out, Please give your opinions |
|
| Dan | September 11, 2023 10:30:55 AM |
| Would anyone know of a good lawyer that could help me with a settlement that mpi is wanting from me |
|
| MPI Victim | April 22, 2023 1:23:34 PM |
After reading all the stories of people being defrauding by this company. I have decided to share our experience.
We were pulled over at a checkstop and blew a fail twice. This seemed wrong since I didn’t have enough to drink that this should have happened. MPI handed out a suspension.
We immediately got bloodwork and a doctors opinion on why this happened and his expert statement. As well as a witness statement. And asked MPI for a review.
During the review we mentioned why the test must have been wrong and that the device didn’t seem to be working properly. And we also didn’t see two devices, but there must have been two since the officer wrote there was.
The officer also wrote there was only a slight smell of alcohol. Again, we didn’t have much to drink and that was almost two hours previously. The MPI reviewing officer said he didn’t even look at the expert statement yet (great that he was unprepared)
MPI upheld the suspension with no reason given
We were able to get dashcam footage and asked two service centers and the manufacturer of the ASD. Both said the same thing. - “The device isn’t working properly and needs to be repaired”
We asked MPI for a review. Told no because it was impossible for both devices to be wrong and not working
We looked at the footage. Yep. The second test did the same thing.
We asked MPI again. We said that both devices are not working and like they said, this is very unlikely. So it is probably the same faulty device. Based on this one fact alone the suspension should be revoked. But nope.
MPI refused again. Saying they/it was calibrated at one point in the past. So basically they are going to ignore the manufacturer and experts saying something is wrong.
We asked MPI if the device was run over and a dangling mess of wires and plastic, would they consider it working because it was calibrated months ago? Silence.
MPI said they have to make a decision based on the balance of probabilities. But they refuse to look at any evidence from the other side. We were never even allowed to show them the video footage nor do we think they even took any of the other evidence into account
MPI told us we can take them to court if we want. Wow. Why is doing the right thing so hard for these people?
Note, MPI actually has a conflict of interest. They profit from suspensions and fines. So it is not surprising that they will ignore any evidence that could cost them money if they revoke them
MPI has a history of acting in bad faith. We have mentioned our story to a few MPI people and lawyers. All have thought it was ridiculous. But have also mentioned the toxic fraudulent actions like this come from the top. And it is just how it is. So just have to hope you never have to deal with them. |
|
| ramona eastman | February 23, 2023 2:37:35 PM |
| Has anyone ever considered why MPI is allowed to collect G.S.T. on used vehicles?
According to what I have read by law the only time anyone can collect G.S.T. on
used items is when they operated a store for resale. I have never heard of MPI
offering used cars for sale. |
|
| Vern Ruml | February 17, 2023 6:21:09 PM |
| Is anyone aware of a mental illness diagnosis that doctors that write reports for mpi prefer to report ? Are
there particular mental illness diagnosis that most often or always result in losing appeals at AICAC ? |
|
| Vern Ruml | February 17, 2023 6:09:32 PM |
| Any recommendations for lawyers for collision related mental illness(s) ?Any recommendations other than
the CAO to write questions to doctors for the purpose of using the doctor report(s) for mpi appeals ? |
|
| Blog Archives - 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 |
|
| Post Your Comments Here. |
